<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dropped? A Detailed Hypothesis Of Why Google Dropped Our Pagerank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carlocab.com/dropped-a-detailed-hypothesis-of-why-google-dropped-our-pagerank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carlocab.com/dropped-a-detailed-hypothesis-of-why-google-dropped-our-pagerank/</link>
	<description>Carl Ocab</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Azlan Hussain (check pagerank)</title>
		<link>http://www.carlocab.com/dropped-a-detailed-hypothesis-of-why-google-dropped-our-pagerank/#comment-31024</link>
		<dc:creator>Azlan Hussain (check pagerank)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carlocab.com/dropped-a-detailed-hypothesis-of-why-google-dropped-our-pagerank/#comment-31024</guid>
		<description>You probably right in that manner. But I do believe PageRank may increase your EPC (earning per click). What I figure out so far is if the page has no PR it indicates that the value of the content might not be as high or accurate compare to a page which has one. So ending up the ads (AdSense) that appear in that page will not be the high paying ad. 

Azlan

PS: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.azlanhussain.com/2008/03/20/check-pagerank-for-internal-pages/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Check PageRank for Internal Pages&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You probably right in that manner. But I do believe PageRank may increase your EPC (earning per click). What I figure out so far is if the page has no PR it indicates that the value of the content might not be as high or accurate compare to a page which has one. So ending up the ads (AdSense) that appear in that page will not be the high paying ad. </p>
<p>Azlan</p>
<p>PS: <a href="http://www.azlanhussain.com/2008/03/20/check-pagerank-for-internal-pages/" rel="nofollow">Check PageRank for Internal Pages</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rome</title>
		<link>http://www.carlocab.com/dropped-a-detailed-hypothesis-of-why-google-dropped-our-pagerank/#comment-30349</link>
		<dc:creator>Rome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carlocab.com/dropped-a-detailed-hypothesis-of-why-google-dropped-our-pagerank/#comment-30349</guid>
		<description>I think all is good now Carl :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think all is good now Carl :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khayte</title>
		<link>http://www.carlocab.com/dropped-a-detailed-hypothesis-of-why-google-dropped-our-pagerank/#comment-23475</link>
		<dc:creator>Khayte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 08:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carlocab.com/dropped-a-detailed-hypothesis-of-why-google-dropped-our-pagerank/#comment-23475</guid>
		<description>Gawd, mine had gone to N/A too, I hate the fact that they have to reduce our PRâ€™s just because we monetize our blogs. Whatâ€™s the catch anyway? They do the same thing, too I guess on their â€˜otherâ€™ websites perhaps. Damnn, it makes me go all crazy. --,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gawd, mine had gone to N/A too, I hate the fact that they have to reduce our PRâ€™s just because we monetize our blogs. Whatâ€™s the catch anyway? They do the same thing, too I guess on their â€˜otherâ€™ websites perhaps. Damnn, it makes me go all crazy. &#8211;,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Work From Home</title>
		<link>http://www.carlocab.com/dropped-a-detailed-hypothesis-of-why-google-dropped-our-pagerank/#comment-10779</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Work From Home</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 01:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carlocab.com/dropped-a-detailed-hypothesis-of-why-google-dropped-our-pagerank/#comment-10779</guid>
		<description>Carl - I have never been one to really understand the PR fasincation.  All I really care about is traffic to my site if I have a PR of 0 but 1000 people to my site a day then I am happier than a PR4 with 200 people a day.  

I do like the picture you used in this post - one of the best I have seen to explain PR 

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl &#8211; I have never been one to really understand the PR fasincation.  All I really care about is traffic to my site if I have a PR of 0 but 1000 people to my site a day then I am happier than a PR4 with 200 people a day.  </p>
<p>I do like the picture you used in this post &#8211; one of the best I have seen to explain PR </p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rome</title>
		<link>http://www.carlocab.com/dropped-a-detailed-hypothesis-of-why-google-dropped-our-pagerank/#comment-9433</link>
		<dc:creator>Rome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 06:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carlocab.com/dropped-a-detailed-hypothesis-of-why-google-dropped-our-pagerank/#comment-9433</guid>
		<description>What you said is really true, in the long run this would benefit everyone. 

When you search something, you should be directed to sites that have the most content in it and not just spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you said is really true, in the long run this would benefit everyone. </p>
<p>When you search something, you should be directed to sites that have the most content in it and not just spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joyce</title>
		<link>http://www.carlocab.com/dropped-a-detailed-hypothesis-of-why-google-dropped-our-pagerank/#comment-8695</link>
		<dc:creator>Joyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carlocab.com/dropped-a-detailed-hypothesis-of-why-google-dropped-our-pagerank/#comment-8695</guid>
		<description>From what I heard, Google has penalized WidgetBucks and not sites linking to widgetbucks. Not sure though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I heard, Google has penalized WidgetBucks and not sites linking to widgetbucks. Not sure though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jochen Van de Velde</title>
		<link>http://www.carlocab.com/dropped-a-detailed-hypothesis-of-why-google-dropped-our-pagerank/#comment-7824</link>
		<dc:creator>Jochen Van de Velde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 15:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carlocab.com/dropped-a-detailed-hypothesis-of-why-google-dropped-our-pagerank/#comment-7824</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t care about PageRank anymore either, as it isn&#039;t that accurate as it was before the time of spammers and blackhatters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care about PageRank anymore either, as it isn&#8217;t that accurate as it was before the time of spammers and blackhatters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlmjedi</title>
		<link>http://www.carlocab.com/dropped-a-detailed-hypothesis-of-why-google-dropped-our-pagerank/#comment-6248</link>
		<dc:creator>mlmjedi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 06:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carlocab.com/dropped-a-detailed-hypothesis-of-why-google-dropped-our-pagerank/#comment-6248</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,my 6 months old site got jump from PR 0 to 2 . Is it fast or slow ? I am aware everyone is talking about Google PR, what have they done right or wrong .Honestly, I dun care or or even bother trying keep up to the latest trend of ever changing Google algorithm.Is PageRank really so important ? to prove oneself:â€?Hey I guess it right this season ?â€? or to show off to whoever ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.carlocab.com/dropped-a-detailed-hypothesis-of-why-google-dropped-our-pagerank/#comment-6242</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 04:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carlocab.com/dropped-a-detailed-hypothesis-of-why-google-dropped-our-pagerank/#comment-6242</guid>
		<description>And whuy dizn&#039;t I saw tat?  :shock:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And whuy dizn&#8217;t I saw tat?  :shock:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.carlocab.com/dropped-a-detailed-hypothesis-of-why-google-dropped-our-pagerank/#comment-6238</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 04:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carlocab.com/dropped-a-detailed-hypothesis-of-why-google-dropped-our-pagerank/#comment-6238</guid>
		<description>At least Google did a good job in presenting them. haha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least Google did a good job in presenting them. haha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
